How does gcc implement stack unrolling for C++ exceptions on linux?
1.gcc(1): GNU project C/C++ compiler - Linux man page
Description:The gcc program accepts options and file names as operands.
Many options have multi-letter names; therefore multiple single-letter
options may not be grouped: -dv is ...
2.gcc - LinuxCommand.org
Description:GCC(1) GNU GCC(1) NAME gcc - GNU project C and C++ compiler
SYNOPSIS gcc [-c│-S│-E] [-std=standard] [-g] [-pg] [-Olevel
...
3.GCC 3.4 Release Series — Changes, New Features, and ...
Description:GCC 3.4 Release Series Changes, New Features, and Fixes. The
final release in the 3.4 release series is GCC 3.4.6. The series is now
closed. GCC 3.4 has many ...
4.Using and Porting the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC ...
Description:3. GCC Command Options . When you invoke GCC, it normally does
preprocessing, compilation, assembly and linking. The "overall options"
allow you to stop this process ...
5.Google C++ Style Guide
Description:Guidelines for C++ style used by Google's open-source projects
6.Android NDK | Android Developers
Description:Important changes: Added the Clang 3.1 compiler to the NDK.
The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) 4.6 is still the default, so you must
explicitly enable the Clang ...
7.C++ - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Description:In 1998, the C++ standards committee (the ISO/IEC
JTC1/SC22/WG21 working group) standardized C++ and published the
international standard ISO/IEC 14882:1998 ...
8.x86 calling conventions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Description:The calling function cleans the stack after the function call
returns. There are some variations in the interpretation of cdecl,
particularly in how to return values.
9.Microchip
Description:MPLAB® Code Configurator (3 visitors) This forum handles
questions and discussions concerning Microchip's MPLAB® Code Configurator
(MC2).
10.Release Notes :: CUDA Toolkit Documentation
Description:The Release Notes for the CUDA Toolkit. ... The arguments for
cufftExedC2C() are incorrect. The plan is a cufftHandle returned from a
prior call ...
No comments:
Post a Comment